Sunday, May 25, 2008

New Podcast Episode: Local Hero: Scott Hurst

On this episode I discuss my autobiography as well as how I have come to embrace humanism as the conclusion from my bizarre life experiences which have included fundamentalist christianity, skinhead gangs, and the mentally retarded.

Scott Hurst and I also discuss the science of alternative fuels.

Listen to this episode

Download this episode (right click and save)

Saturday, May 24, 2008

Religion is NOT a private matter!

Religion is NOT a private matter!

I have been reading Austin Dacey's book The Secular Conscience. I am almost finished with it, and my only complaint is that Dacey gave his book the wrong title, he should have entitled it, "the most important book of 2008."

It is the most important book of 2008.

The basic argument of the book is that there is a public nature to ethics, because there is a public nature to ethics, all ethical claims are subject to public inquiry.

That may not sound contreversial until you understand that it has big implications.

For example when someone says something like "stem-cell research is wrong because life begins at conception."

or, "The Jews are chosen people, loved above other people, by God."
or, "Masturbation is harmful because imagining someone who is not your spouce is de facto adultery."

Most liberals, myself included, have tended to respond with a quiet respect for their neighbors belief.

You say that it would be wrong to say that this person is wrong.

After all this is a religious belief which they hold.

We must respect a person's religion.

After all, religion is a private matter.

Dacey says that this is not true.

That religion follows ethical claims, and that those ethical claims are universal to humanity. That is, we can hold religious claims to ethical standards.

This has even further political implications in that operating publically according to these principles, not only can one feel just in crticizing religious claims, one must.

Religious claims are attempts at ethical appeals, and can be ethically tested, and judged.

There is one particular part of the book in which the author takes a spectrum of statements and compares them to whether or not they are unethical attempts at persuasion.

They are:

1. I'm right, but I could be mistaken.
2.I'm right.
3.I'm right, you're wrong.
4.I'm right, you're wrong, here's why you should change your mind.
5. I'm right, you're wrong, go to hell.
6.I'm right, you're wrong, change your mind or be killed.

According to Dacey, statements 1-4 are equally ethical.

He argues that we as liberals shudder to tell someone they are wrong, while it is a simple law of rhetoric, that for some statements to be true others must be wrong.

This is has a powerful political implication by changing the language and style of liberal politics.

Allowing us to break the illusion that equates religion with morality, and assert that conscience is a human virtue, not a religious one.

Dacey gives liberalism back its teeth.

Friday, May 23, 2008

Excellence

Excellence

Yesterday I read an essay by Paul Kurtz entitled "The Ethics of Excellence."

I'm finding the humanist work of Paul Kurtz reflects my own ethical intuitions and furthermore gives me ideas on how to elaborate them.

But I will try not discuss this great man so much, and focus on his work.

First we must ask ourselves the question, "What is excellence?"

In the essay Kurtz asks us to first thing of athletics and excellence in athletics, and he tells us that ethical excellence is not far off.

I'm not a big sports fan but I do like some. I like fighting, weight lifting, running and swimming.

An excellent fighter is one who can consistently dominate his/her oponent.

An excellent weight-lifter is one who is constantly outdistancing themselves and demonstrating ever-increasing strength.

Running is like weight lifting in that the runner races against him/herself and also like fighting in the domination of oponents. So is swimming.

Let these images enter your mind, and try to think of how a more absract concept of excellence might emerge.

Kurtz writes, "Excellence is a thoroughly relative term, applicable to human beings engaged in some activity to compare their capacities and achievements."

He identifies several conditions, or evaluating procedures, for excellence. The first is comparitive, which is highly analogous to the plight of athletes.

The second is consistency.

As I read this powerful essay, I immedeatly realized that this is one I have been weak with in my own life. Consistency.

I wrote on my last essay that to this day I have a reputation in my home town of Lubbock for being the very picture of inconsistency.

In the 2 years I have lived in Dallas I have become very vigilant of inconsistency in my own life, with varying degrees of success.

Kurtz tells us, " It is no a single success - important as they may be to record - but achievement over a period of time that most impresses us."

He goes on to provide a long list of heroes in the arts and sciences and adds, "These individuals are considered excellent, not because they achieved recognition, but because of the intrinsic qualities of their work, which manifests creativity, innovation, discovery. They are noteworthy because they have exceeded our expectations and made an outstanding contribution."

Excellence is first and foremost self-serving in Kurtz. In fact all of Kurtz's virtues are presented as something to be achieved for a better life, a happier life, a richer life, even Kurtz's uncompromising demands for compassion and philanthropy.

"Here we appraise the following: (1) the kinds of values a person cherishes nd that activate him, (2) the style of life he has adopted, and (3) how he relates to other persons within the sphere of interaction. In dealing with ethical excellence, I am not referring simply to a person's chief occupation or career -as important and satisfying as that may be in achieving the good life - but to the total constellation of values and principles manifested throuought the entire life. A person can be a great physicist and lead a miserable life, a great mathematician and not know how to get his car started, a sensitive poet and a terrible husband."

So Kurtz, with his great fondness of lists, gives us the term "excelsior" as the cummulitaion of a list of traits which each of us must harness and cultivate to attain excellence.

What are the traits that give us excelsior?

1.)Autonomy
2.)Intelligence
3.)Self-discipline
4.)Self-respect
5.)Creativity
6.)Motivation
7.) Affirmation
8.) Health
9.) Joie de vivre

All 9 of these traits of the state of excelsior are defined by Kurtz in such a way as where if you make them a high priority, you are in the process of achieving them. Kurtz does not give a operationalized grade one must achieve to claim these virtues as their own.

Kurtz also, notably, gives empiricism a strong place in developing the state of excelsior, or ethical excellence. He gives these as criteria which we can use in developing a habit of self-observation as we make diagnosis of our state in life.

So many ethical systems (notably religious ones) give abstract virtues with unattainable goals which can never be observed or properly monitored in life. As the Christian who has the impossible standard of loving the whole world, but is always the "chiefest of sinners" no matter what they do.

I prefer Kurtz's system, to being like the Red Queen in Alice in Wonderland, running as fast as I can to stay where I am.

No, as I have already noted, I need purpose.

I need to know what to watch for to see if I am indeed growing as a person.

In my life I have done well with a sense of autonomy, or self-determination. Though I have noticed that many of those who I have cared for seem to be in a constant state of inertia, waiting for something to either happen to them or for them. Indeed, this is wasting your one and very precious life.

I have always also had a great sense of motivation, a need to always be giving birth to something. I have a mind that is pregnant like a swollen ant queen, ready to give birth to nation of offspring, and likewise had the will to act. I have also always been creative, which is what motivates me in the first place.

Affirmation has been a unique gift for me. Affirmation is Kurtz's version of hope, notably a totally secular one, in which the person is expected to have a certain degree of confidence in their will, their action, and have a persistent expectation of success. This has been mine for nearly a decade now, and I am only growing stronger in this virtue.

My weaknesses have been intelligence, though always reading and thinking, my love affair with logic and science as a way of testing things is sadly new in my life. Only since my college education.

Likewise, I have only recently begun to give self-discipline and health such a persistent place in my life. We have only this one life, and if we do not care for our bodies we needlessly shorten the days we can act with purpose. Death is certain. My need to be healthy, along with the realities of my education, are ever teaching me how to be disciplined, how to pick the hammer up and strike it again and again, knowing that the task worth doing is scarecely swift in its conclusion.

Self-respect has been a good friend to me for years now. I think that I have all the potential of a fully active and intelligent human. For me, it is this radiant humanity which I worship in others which I see as my own. Humans are the most vicious of animals, the only demons, gods, or angels that exist. I do not doubt my potential, and tire of others doubting theirs.

Joie de vivre, or enjoying life in French, has been taught to me by my wife.
When we first fell in love, I wore a scowl on my face all the time, it was an accessory to my punk rock outfits. She was like a pixie in a fairy tale fluttering in a delighted madness from flower to flower, she showed me this unbridled joy as she stops and searches for beautiful things in nature. Since then, my own joy is ever increasing and manifesting. It is indeed, excellent.

These are some words to ponder, and perhaps apply in the search for a better life.

Thursday, May 22, 2008

The Good Life: Part 1: Power

The Good Life : Part 1: Power

Ever since I stopped believing in God it took me a minute to find my positive outlook again.

I had been using the whole idea of God as justfification for betting on a better future, when I stopped I felt lost and depressed. I still felt that truth was important enough that I should endure my pain rather than flee back into a lie.

I stopped believing in God by reading "The God Delusion" by Richard Dawkins, which is truly a wonderful book, and really a great treatiese on scientfiic thinking. But it does nothing for someone who has truly placed their hope in God.

When I read "The God Delusion" I had been a liberal Christian for years.
I did not believe in Hell, I belonged to a Church which cared more about community service than it did about the angels, and it was a really fulfilling life. In fact it is because of churches like the one to which I belonged that I know I can make common cause with so many Christians.

What did Richard offer me as an alternative, well he offered awe at nature.

I was already a Junior neuroscience major at the time that I read "The God Deluison" and I had seen neurons stained for their metabolism, I had followed a thought along its circuits. I had taught herds of pigs tricks, and I had seen the secrets of a persons feelings ratted out by the muscles on their faces with electrical signals that cannot be measured without electrodes. Yet, Richard's offer of awe at nature as a replacement for what I once got from religion was not cutting it.

I guess it does the trick for some, but awe at nature is something else for me.

I need purpose in my life.

Nature offers no purpose that I can embrace. The chemicals collide, electron densities decide which ones stick and which ones repel, and from this comes all matter. Our instincts are all built to the purpose of making as many babies as possible, as our DNA has developed to steer billions of other molecules towards nothing but reproduction.

If anyone tells me that awe at nature is the purpose of life, for one I have to wonder why they don't have dozens of children, because thats what evolution demands of any who can do it.

The cosmos speed with us at some insignificant corner, with the end of all memory as we know it an inevitable fact of the process.

I love nature, it is most amazing. It does nothing for my feelings about my life.

I need purpose.

I have always found one reliable source for purpose. As I have always needed purpose and was not raised religious.

When I was lost, and I had lost my God, I went into my own mind to seek a wellspring of purpose which was once there for me as a child, that wellspring is power.

Power gets a bad reputation in society. The first thing that comes to mind is the intro in the "Lord of the Rings" film in which the narrator says,

"And one ring was given to the Kings of men, who above all, desire power."

Oh no! The Kings of Men desire power. How terrible!

Lets all be good humble trembling Christians, and yearn for impotence instead!

Fuck that!

My thrist for power began at an early age.

My mother and father divorced when I was around 3 or 4 in Chile. The year would have been 1982, the country was in the grip of a military dictatorship, and my father's family was in danger due to their leftist leanings. In fact he had already been sequestered at gun point along with my grandfather as communists.

The threat of the police state was everywhere. I remember one day that my grandmother, who was a right-winger to her core, and I were shopping. She had to pick me up and run into a department store to escape the blast of a water cannon.

Again I reitorate, my grandmother was sympathetic to the goverment, and was not a protester. It did not matter. She was in the street when the government felt that it needed a display of its power.

Thats right! A water cannon, the same kind that were used against protesters in the United States during the civil rights movement.

My mother moved with my brother and I to Argentina shortly after her divorce. My brother is paraplegic and blind. My mother had remarried a cruel man.

Thats a crash course in power for you, try to see someone live with that kind of disability and yearn for impotence. I will revisit the concept of power with the disabled again shortly.

My step-father would beat my brother regularly, and as a child during these episodes I tasted power for the very first time. My step father would heat his fork with a lighter and burn my brother because he felt he was eating too slowly. I stood up to my step-father, and was punished myself. But it was too late, I had become as the kings of men "who above all, desire power."

I broke the school bully's nose that same year in school.

My father came to get my brother and I to take costudy shortly after that. In the US I learned a whole new kind of powerlessness first by not speaking the language, and later by beeing sexually molested by a neighbor.

It was at this young age that I decided that most important thing in my life had to be the acquisition of power.

My favorite philosopher, Paul Kurtz wrote, "The first humanist virtue is the development of one's own sense of power-of the belief that we can do something, that we can succeed, that our own preperations and efforts will pay off."

In the years that followed my molestation I embraced countless phases, most of them in Lubbock, Texas, where to this day I have a reputation for being someone who is caught up in every flight of fancy.

These phases included trying to be a wizard with magickal powers, which lasted from ages 12 to about 15. It was during this time my friend Nick Simmons and I were called into the office at Mackenzie Jr. High for trying to try a cult in school.
You should have seen my father's face.

At age 15 I wanted to be the gothic dark prince of Lubbock, Texas and essentially try to become Marilyn Manson. I began to fight my bullies, and win. At one point after a fight the wrestling coach, took me aside after reprimanding me and asked me to join the wrestling team. I wish I had accepted the invitation, it would have taught me much needed discipline.

At age 17 I had to go further. I antagonized my parents until they kicked me out of the house. This was no small feat, and required me becomming violent with them to do so. But I wanted to be the punk rock ideal, a year later I was the leader of my own skinhead gang, which you had to beat-in to join, just like the bloods and crips. I could tell stories about the Dirt City Skinheads (DCS) all day long.

A little over a year later I found Jesus.

Jesus became another source of power to me. Anyone who has any doubts need only look at my art from that period. I was drawing depicitions of Christ in the explosions of atom bombs. I even called Jesus the Panzer Christ, invoking the image of Nazi war machines as analogs of my God.

I was not a typical Christian. Which should not come as a surprise, I have never been a typical anything.

Yet, I went to a Church in the black neighborhood of Lubbock where I would speak in tounges and see people healed by the laying on of hands. It was the promise of such direct supernatural power which kept me in the Charismatic (pentecostal) movement for so long. It did not take long for me to lose exponentially more of my belief in God when I left this world where Christians are promised "spiritual gifts" of supernatural power. These Christians were here for the power of God at their disposal, and so was I.

Paul Kurtz continues in the same paragraph I quoted above, "The courage to excel- the courage to become what we want, to realize what we will-is essential. It is in the process of atainment which we thrive: Sisyphus is not to be condemned: there are always new mountains to climb, new stones to heave, and they are never the same."

I did not just go to church for my sense of power, I also started doing as much as I could in the community.

My friend Mark Key and I started a missionary outreach to the punk subcluture where we were both big fish in the small pond of Lubbock, TX. We started a weekly bible study, which as far as I know still exists to this day under the leadership of our friend Nat Long, who also pastors at a retirement home. Some of the punk rock kids are still around, including one skinhead who is now a police officer in Lubbock.

I started a runaway shelter out of my own apartment, we called it "The House of Calvary." We took in kids who were in the worst kind of problems, who sending them home to their parents would in some cases have been sending them home to a nightmare of sexual abuse.

One of my best treated kids, actually had his parents regularly stealing from him. I had no resources and no money, but once you begin a project like this, if you have an ounce of human compassion you cannot easily stop. I had several church organizations promising me support soon if I would just keep this project going. I kept it going for over a year.

All of the kids would eventually leave because they would tire of my rules.

I remember once seeing a thirty year old man with one 16 year old girl at my place, and screaming in his face. The thirty year old was a gangster and a drug dealer, and I risked quite a bit to disrespect him like that. My only regret is that I didn't put the son of a bitch in the hospital.

Paul Kurtz continues, " However in order to have a sense of our own self-power, it is necessary to be able to live in an ambiguous world of indeterminacy and contingency. Nature is not fixed, nor is our destiny preplanned. We can build new monuments and discover new theorems; there are new worlds to be conquered and created. We must not let ourselves be mastered by events, but we must master them- as far as we can- without fear or recrimination."

When "The House of Calvary" finally died I acquired a job as an orderly at the Lubbock State School, which is an institution dedicated to the care and keeping of the mentally retarded. I got the job by telling the head of the H.R. department that God had told me to get the job, this is no joke, also no laughing matter.

It was at the State School that I developed my love for science. Slowly, and due to many harsh conflicts with reality.

I worked in Birch, which is a dorm known for high-functioning adolescent males. To make that a little easier to understand, it was teenagers who were only slightly less intelligent than normal teens.

I cared for sexual predators, which was a crash course in the ambiguities of nature for me, as a victim of a sexual predator. These guys who had the normal hormones of an adult male, but their underdeveloped brains did not give them the power to restrain themselves.

There it is again, evil, corrupting power. Which should not be yearned for.

If one thinks powerlessness is virtuous, one simply needs to spend some time among the mentally retarded.

One will also see the most amazing and virtuous displays of power imaginable.

I have seen clients go from total lack of self control, to being as productive and assimilated into society as possible. I have seen mentally retarded individuals work as hard as I have ever worked, to master the tedium of the jobs they are allowed to do, and to master their own impulses with less than the brain power of a normal human being.

It was with these wonderful mentally retarded individuals that I fell in love with the mind and consequently the brain.

Kurtz tells us, "If cowardice and fear are our nemeses, so are gullibility and nicompoopery, which must be controlled by the use of reason. To use reason is to demand evidence for our beliefs, and to suspend belief wherever we do not have adequate grounds for it; it requires that we do not be deluded by purveyors of false wares, but that we base our desires, as far as possible, upon the reasonable ground of practiced reflection. There is a constant tendency to fly from reason to a pradise of perfection or quietude. There is no easly salvation for humans, and it is a delusion to think that we can find it. Life is restless and outgoing. It can never be content for what it is; it is always in the process of becomming. It is the new that we worship, not because it is better but because it is a product of our own creative energy."

I saw my fellow Charismatic Christian employees pray for, and try to exorcise autistic and retarded clients when they would have a violent outburst, that I admit matches the new testament descriptions of demon possesion. This sowed seeds of doubt for me.

There were a few misadventures along the way of me quitting religion and seeking new sources of power, much like the recovering alcoholic will occasionally demonstrate a relapse. These relapses are interesting, but I will skip them and focus on two events, as I continue this autobiographical account of my relationship with power.

Amy Devoge had a heroic role in saving me from Christianity. She did something very important, she inspired me to break several years of abstinence. Which I had been holding too as a devout Charismatic christian.

Kurtz writes on this subject, " Among the finest pleasures of life are the joys of sexual passion and eroticism. The celibate has committed a sin against himself, for he has repressed the most exquisite pleasure of all: the full and varied sexual life that is so essential to happiness."

I learned the truth of Kurtz's words from Amy.

Amy and I went on a tremendous adventure to travel the country, with very little money. In the course of this adventure I took up two activities, pan-handling and secular activism.

I will not write much about my pan-handling here, except to admit to having done it, it is not the worst of my crimes.

But from the education I had recieved in Charismatic Christianity along with the life lessons that I had been taught by the mentally retarded individuals placed in my care, I set forth to change the world.

Though I still identified as a Christian at this point, I saw the bible as purely allegorical and of little use besides as a source of personal inspiration (which it can still provide, as any fiction can) and I was having serious doubts about my internal dialogue with the almighty.

Eventually Amy and I arrived at Santa Cruz, California, where I became a fulltime activist. I joined the Santa Cruz Programming Collective which was dedicated to promoting anarchist thought with art events. I joined Food Not Bombs, where I washed dishes, cooked, and served the homeless, who I was sleeping with at night. I joined countless anti-Iraq war protests, and I also joined Earth First! the militant enviromentalist group. It was here that I first learned to use basic organizational tactics that I had learned at the Church and apply them to something else. I will always remember this as one of the happiest times in my life, and the fact that I was finally getting laid played no small part in that joy.

Kurtz writes, "Our actions are mere random impulses until they are organized into creative work. It is the unity of effort and energy that gives vent to our dreams. Thus the good life uniquely involves creativity. This is the great source of joy and exuberance. It is in our work that we best reveal ourselves, not in idle play or leisure - as important as these things are - but in the mood of seriousness. Yet creative work is a form of play and, if coterminus with it, can be among the highest forms of aesthetic satisfaction: planning a project, teaching a class, constructing a road, and performing a symphony are all forms of creative endeavor. Those who do not work lack the key ingredient of happiness."

Alas, Amy and I did not work out. I returned to Lubbock and had one last relapse, but this one was a little different, I wanted to change the church.

For this time I wrote a blog called Christianarchy, which was based on the idea that Christianity could be a force for the left, indeed it could be the strongest force the left had ever posessed. I had not yet learned about the Catholic liberation theology of latin america, and was trying to birth a Charismatic version here.

I helped teach Sunday School and Youth Ministry. Our youth ministry at my church was almost exclusively black. The only non-black kids, were the offspring of the congregation. I learned a lot doing this.

My pastor Gary Scoggins, who will always have a special place in my heart, encouraged me to meet the parents of the neighborhood kids and power revisited me again.

I saw that in Lubbock, Texas, the black community lacked power. I started learning about Malcom X and the Black Panthers, and learning about the wonderful Black Power movement, which is still a great source of inspiration to me.

I saw that one of the greatest hinderences to the black community in Lubbock, Texas was a hard-core commitment to anti-intellectualism.

When a black kid was well spoken, or did well in school, they were called "wanna-be-white." I found this to be the source of their powerlessness.

So I started to try to encourage the church to support programs in the youth ministry to reward good grades. Simple and cheap, if you ask me, and to this day I still think they should do it.

But I was ignored, and the Youth ministry instead spoke of the evils of liberalism and abortion. I left, and never went back. It was a waste of my power to stay one minute longer.

It was then that I met my current wife, and a wellspring of power herself, Kalisa Myers. Kalisa and I started a local political organization called Youth Emerge Today (YET) which was committed to empowering the local youth scene in Lubbock, of which I was a big fish in a small pond. YET registered people to vote, organized public AIDS testing, handed out condoms, picked up trash in the neighborhoods we hung out in, and has built relationships that are still going strong. Not the least of which was Kalisa and I's marriage.

However, we encountered a terrible inertia in our young people. I immedeately noticed, that they had no concept of their own power. I also noticed they had no academic ambitions, as a rule, and saw this as harder to detect version of the anti-intellectualism I saw in the black community.

Our kids, who were predominantly white, read one or two books, and they loved to talk about the one or two books they had read. But they weren't reading then, far more interested instead in intoxicants, parties, and their current dead-end jobs.

This gave rise to turning point in my life. I went to college. It is the second best decision I have ever made, the first was falling in love with Kalisa.

Lawrance Krauss has said that he wishes that everyone would lose, "one deeply held belief" in their education. I lost several.

My psychology professor and research mentor, Jeff Larsen, taught me to reject my own intuitions and to replace them with evidence based skepticism. My history classes, and personal studies in economics, caused me to abandon the extreme radical left as just another religion.

My study of neuroscience caused me to stop believing in the afterlife, and the soul, ironically almost a full year before I stopped believing in God.

Which brings us back to the beginning of this piece. I stopped believing in God, and was lost without purpose.

So I found power again. I found it, incase you hadn't noticed, in the words of Paul Kurtz, which I first heard on the Point of Inquiry podcast.

I began to see science not just as "wonder at nature" but a great tool to yield the greatest potential for civilization and the individual human expereince.

To quote Kurtz, "There are those who say that it is evil for humans to modify the natural ecology, as if it were some holy shrine beyond transformation...Art adds to nature; technology is the purest art of civilized life."

Science is art and art is power.

I began to experience, for the first time as an atheist, a serious sense of community with my fellow humans and yearn for us to act as one in some way.

"Important as individual audacity, courage, intelligence, self-power, and the fulfillment of one's personal dreams and proejcts are, the good life can not be experienced alone, in isolation. The richest of human plans and joys are shared with others. Love in its truest sense is nonpossessive, a cooperate participation and friendship, and is the noblest expression of a moral relationship."

I began to reach out to my friends who believed as I did, and we faught the supression of Darwinism in the biology department in my school, we started a Sam Harris book club, and now we are moving full speed ahead with an on campus club.

"...we cannot focus on inward ends alone, for the world intrudes in our domain of interests. We should develop a wider moral concern for those beyond our immedieate contact, for the communnity, for the nation and the world at large. A person's creative work can and should involve others, and a sense of our moral obligations and responsibilities should develop that enlarges our horizons and enhances our universe."

Notice that at the center of Kurtz's words are your own individual well-being, that altruism in this form is unapologetically selfish. It totally feeds into the quality of your life. It is this kind of thinking that my quest for power has brought me to, in this journey of stumbling, tears, fanaticism, merrymaking, and humor.

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Interview with Ghost Investigator: Alison Smith

Monday, May 19, 2008

Center for Inquiry

I just posted this on the CFI forum:

I think changing the USA may not be as long of a process as it seems.

If meme theory (Dawkins, Dennet, Blackmore) is correct then one idea can rapidly overthrow another. In fact there seems to be some evidence for this in language, as it has demonstrated something akin to punctuated equilibrium, or rapid evolutionary bursts. In history Christianity overturned hellenistic polytheism with simple yet effective competitive strategies akin to those we see in genetics. That is, if meme theory is right.

I think that some other things to consider is that most people identify as political moderates, which makes me wonder how fundamentalist they really are.
I think people are generally open minded, and the culture war is not for deeply entrenched minds, but for minds which are in constant flux.

This seems to match nicely with what Hitchens and Dawkins have reported from their book tours, that America is much more open to atheism than either of them ever imagined.

With an organization as powerful and influential as CFI, the simple commitment to increase the presence of the Center in each of our communities could create a massive cultural impact within our lifetimes.

I think that the evidence supports this if one sees what each Center for Inquiry has accomplished in all of the cities which it is in.

I for one know that CFI Ontario has become a real player in Canadian politics and its director, Justin Trottier, has literally become a hero of mine. He is the first hero I have ever had who is actually younger than I.

I also know that CFI in Washingtong DC is actively lobbying congress.

I should not need to remind anyone of the wonderful things that Paul Kurtz reported in this episode.

Truthfully, CFI is demonstrating the effectiveness which we really need to see America return to its once strong commitment to enlightenment principles.

It is clear that freethinkers are truly todays heirs of the founding father’s original movement, and CFI seems to have the muscle necessary to carry our ideas into the marketplace in a significant way.

Damn, I think I should add here that I have never received a dime from CFI, and have actually given them a few of my own.

My opinions are sincere, even if they sound a little zealous.

Labels:

Friday, May 16, 2008

Rational Response Squad Interview

Here is an interview with Brian and Kelly from the Rational Response Squad.

Listen to this episode

Labels:

Secular/Skeptic/Science Organizations: My Judgement

Secular/Skeptical/Science Organizations : My Judgement

Yesterday I was very lucky to be able to interview my friends, the Rational Response Squad leaders Brian Sapient and his sweetheart Kelly.

I love the Rational Response Squad and think they provide a very important service that was needed, is needed, and will continue to be needed until the day finally arrives that the United States is a secular country. Even then, the Rational Response Squad has been lovingly embraced in other countries such as Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia, so if anything I am underestimating the service that they provide.

The thing about the Rational Response Squad is that they are unique. Another word for unique, which is used in business, is niche.

I have heard a story about Malcom X and Martin Luther King. I don't know if the story is true, but it makes my point nicely.

I am told that Martin Luther King had a regular practice of telling the establishment of a city (which would not have even met with Malcom X) that they could deal with him now or have to deal with Malcom X later.

This is a wonderful strategy, and has been the reality of countless political movements since time immemorial.

In this example I am likening the Rational Response Squad to Malcom X.

Malcom X told black people, in a time in which they were being lynched on a regular basis, "If a man puts his hand on you send him to the graveyard!"

Malcom X encouraged black people to form rifle clubs.

Malcom X created environments in which black people could feel proud and empowered, and gave countless blacks who did not have the stomach for dealing so closesly with the enemy or people who were on the fence, and outlet for their feelings and energy.

Yet none of us could deny that Martin Luther King Jr. represented the flagship of the Civil Rights movement.

The hindsight of history shows us that Martin Luther King's patience, tireless work, and sacrifice to deal effectively with mainstream society is what actually got the Civil Rights movement as far as it did. A movement which is not yet won.

The term I used was carefully chosen. The term is FLAGSHIP.

F-L-A-G-S-H-I-P

Get that word clearly in your mind.

I know its easy to scan blogs and miss something important, so here, just one more time:

FLAGSHIP.

What do I mean by flagship, I mean one organization, which is effective with the mainstream, government, academia, and business.

There are a lot of contenders for that, let me list some:

1.) Secular Student Allience
2.) Freedom From Religion Foundation
3.) American Humanist Association
4.) Atheist Allience International
5.) American Atheists
6.) Institute for Humanist Studies
7.) Americans United for the Seperation of Church and State
8.) Union of Concerned Scientists
9.) Scientists and Engineers for America
10.) National Center for Science Education
11.) Skeptic Society
12.) James Randi Educational Foundation
13.) Richard Dawkins Foundation for Science and Reason
14.) The Unitarian Church
15.) Institute for the Secularization of Islamic Society
16.) International Humanist and Ethical Union
17.) World Pantheist Movement
18.) World Union of Deists
19.) The Brights Net
20.) American Secular Union
21.) The Atheist Agenda
22.) Chruch of Reality
23.) The Humanist Institute
24.) Secular Coalition for America
25.) The Center for Inquiry

I have focused this list to the United States and International Organizations which are active in the United States.

If I extended this list to all countries it would more than double.

I have also excluded countless local organizations like the ones in my area which I am active with.

My friends at the Rational Response Squad would probably ( though I am just guessing) say this is great! The more the merrier. Thats right! The RRS loves all you guys, you should consider returning the sentiment.

Thats because they are very kind, and cool, and they are doing something that none of these other groups are doing, which is serving a section of the population which is for all intents and purposes out of the reach of those above groups. It is the only reason that I did not include them in that grotesquely long list.

I think that list is a problem.

I think there are groups like the Rational Response Squad which fill a niche, and those groups are awesome and deserve nothing but our support.

I think the groups on that list are, for the most part, doing the same exact thing with varying concentration.

FACT: Most of the above organizations compete for the same sector of the populace for donations, volunteers, and general support.

This is a problem.

Now, LET ME BE CLEAR, I do not believe that we should have some kind of arena fight in which all these wonderful organizations try to kill teach other until only the best one is left and all others are soaked in their own blood and tears.

I think we probably need more than one of the above organizations. For example the James Randi Educational Foundation, has gotten extremely good at what they do and no one wants to take over some of the tasks they have perfected in their public service. Likewise, the National Center for Science Education focuses primarily on the battlefield of the classroon as pseudoscientists pass legislation for "equal time" for their nonsense.

While other organizations above also attack woo and poor education, these two are probably the best at it. Most would probably agree.

I also think all skeptical, secular, or science activists are heroes. I think they are living life as it should be lived, and that their virtue is comming out their pores.

But I do think that the list is just too fucking long!

What I suggest is a great movement of consolidation of the above organizations into a giant flagship. Where we concentrate support to win major victories in the mainstream.

Organizations like the Rational Response Squad, who are doing intellectual guerilla warfare in the parts of society normally out of reach need their more mainstream counterparts to win in the greater society.

If there is anything that I have become convinced of it is that there are many, many, many more of us than I ever imagined.

The people who are already giving money should think very hard about the argument that I have presented. The people who are already volunteering should think very hard about the argument that I have presented.

For the rest of us I only ask, why are you not active?

If you are someone who has a strong libertine streak and needs to be free to be profane and proud and strong, allow me to recommend the Rational Response Squad, they are the only home that many of us could ever have. My punk rock tendencies definitely have found a home among these wonderful people. As I said in the interview, only the Rational Response Squad could have given us Greydon Square.

However, for the rest of you, those of you who prefer NPR to the local rap and rock stations. Those of you who know the difference between the opera and the symphony. Those of you who probably make above $50,000 per year. Those of you who have to wear a tie every day, you need to take some responsibility for the society you live in. You need to pull out your check book, scan the above list, find which of these groups you most like, and give them some motherfucking money.

Thats it.

Thats my judgement.